Home | Islamic Lifestyle | Miscellaneous | Dr. Aafia Siddiqui

Dr. Aafia Siddiqui

BACKGROUND

Dr. Aafia Siddiqui was born on 2 March 1972 in Karachi, Pakistan. She is one of three siblings.
Aafia’s father Mohammad Siddiqui was a UK-trained doctor and her mother, Ismet, is a
homemaker. Aafia has three children: Ahmed (b. 1996), Maryam (b. 1998), and Suleman (b.
2002), the latter of whom remains missing to this day.

Aafia moved to Texas in 1990 to be near her brother, and after spending a year at the
University of Houston, transferred to Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Siddiqui’s
fellow students say she was a quiet, studious woman who was devout in her religious beliefs
but far from the media characterisation of ‘Lady Qaeda’. A fellow student, Hamza, recalled in an
interview with the BBC, “I remember Aafia as being sweet, mildly irritating but harmless”.

During her time at MIT, Aafia joined the campus Muslim Student Association (MSA) and was
actively involved in efforts to portray the teachings of Islam to non-Muslims in order to better
their understanding of her faith and invite them to Islam. Her emphasis in her life on bettering
the conditions of Muslims even pervaded her academic achievements. During her sophomore
year at MIT, she won a grant of $5,000 to study the effects of Islam on women living in
Pakistan. In addition to her many academic achievements, Aafia earned the honourable status
of committing the entire Qur’an to memory.

Following her graduation, Aafia married a medical student Mohammed Amjad Khan. She
subsequently entered Brandeis University as a graduate student in cognitive neuroscience.
Citing the difficulty of living as Muslims in the United States after 9/11 and following FBI
harassment of her husband, Aafia and her husband returned to Pakistan. They stayed in
Pakistan for a short time, and then returned to the United States. They remained there until
2002, and then moved back to Pakistan. Some problems developed in their marriage, and Aafia
was eight months pregnant with their third child when she and Khan were separated. She and
the children stayed at her mother’s house, while Khan lived elsewhere in Karachi. After giving
birth to her son, Aafia stayed at her mother’s house for the rest of the year, returning to the US
without her children around December 2002 to look for a job in the Baltimore area, where her
sister had begun working at Sinai Hospital. On 1 March 2003, Pakistani authorities arrested
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Aafia and her children disappeared just 27 days later.

DISAPPEARANCE

According to Aafia’s mother, Aafia left their home in Gulshan-e-Iqbal in a Metro-cab on 28
March, 2003 to catch a flight to Rawalpindi, but never reached the airport. In February 2010
Aafia’s eldest son returned to the scene and described how, when he, his mother and siblings
came out of their home, fifteen to twenty people, including a ‘white lady’ and members of the
ISI, were waiting in three to four vehicles on the next street and subsequently kidnapped them.

About Aafia

Written by Administrator
Thursday, 11 March 2010 10:13

Aafia was placed into one black car and the crying children into another. She described to her
lawyer that she was immediately hooded and drugged. When she awoke she was tied to a
gurney in a place that could not have been Karachi because the air was very dry.

Following her trial, Aafia’s lawyer Elaine Sharpe, described how Aafia’s baby, Suleman, was
believed to have been killed during the arrest. Dr Siddiqui was later shown a picture of her baby,
lying in a pool of blood. It is not known if Suleman, who would now be 7 years old, is alive.

Pakistani papers mentioned reports the following day that a woman had been taken into
custody of terrorism charges and confirmation came from a Pakistan Interior Ministry
spokesman. The media reported that Aafia Siddiqui had been ‘picked up in Karachi by an
intelligence agency’ and ‘shifted to an unknown place for questioning’. A year later, the press
quoted a Pakistani government spokesman who said that she had been handed over to US
authorities in 2003.

Aafia Siddiqui had been missing for more than a year when the FBI put her photographs on its
website.

Aafia’s mother described in a BBC interview in 2003, how a ‘man wearing a motor-bike helmet’
which he did not remove, arrived at the family residence and warned her that if she ever wanted
to see her daughter and grandchildren again, she should keep quiet. Both the Pakistan
government as well as US officials in Washington denied any knowledge of Aafia’s
custody. Aafia’s sister, Fowzia also says that she was told by the then Interior Minister Syed
Faisal Saleh Hayat in 2004 that Aafia had been released and would return home soon

At almost precisely the same time that Aafia went missing, two other alleged Al Qaeda suspects
disappeared from Karachi – Majid Khan and ‘Ali ‘Abd al-‘Aziz ‘Ali. They would be amongst
hundreds arrested by the Pakistani intelligence services and handed over to the FBI and CIA as
part of the War on Terror. Like Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Khan and Ali would not reappear
again until September 2006, following their transfer from CIA custody, where they were
reportedly tortured including the use of waterboarding, to Guantanamo.

SECRET DETENTION

Aafia claims that she was kidnapped by the Pakistani intelligence services with her children and
transferred into US custody. She further alleges that she was detained in a series of secret
prisons for five years during which time she was repeatedly abused, tortured and raped. Aafia’s
claim is substantiated by former Bagram detainees who affirmed the presence of a female
detainee of Pakistani origin at Bagram, with the prisoner ID “650”. The International Committee
for the Red Cross also confirmed that a woman had been detained at Bagram. Immediately
after his release from Guantanamo in 2009, ex-Bagram detainee, Binyam Mohamed declared
that the woman he saw in Bagram, with the prison no. 650, was indeed Aafia Siddiqui.

The US has previously denied the presence of female detainees in Bagram and that Aafia was
ever held there, bar for medical treatment (after they shot her) in July 2008.

Little is known about what happened to Aafia and her children in the five years in which they
were missing. However, in October 2009, when Aafia was visited by a Pakistani parliamentary
delegation she spoke a little about the five years in which she had been disappeared, saying “I
have been through living hell”. She described being given an injection and when she came to,
she was in a cell. She said she was being brainwashed by men who spoke perfect English, who
may have been Afghans. She did not think they were Pakistanis. She described being forced to
make false confessions and sign statements. She alleged that she had been tortured although
she provided no details. She was also told by her captors that if she did not co-operate, her
children would suffer. During her trial, Aafia alluded to being tortured in secret prisons, to being
raped, her children being tortured, and being threatened to be “sent back to the bad guys” –
men she described as sounding like Americans but could not be “real Americans” but “pretend
Americans” due to the treatment they had subjected her to. After her trial it emerged that the
government of Pakistan had put a gag order on Aafia’s family in exchange for releasing her
eldest son Ahmed.

Aafia’s lawyers, Elaine Sharpe and Elizabeth Fink, would later corroborate this by stating
publicly that she had “been through years of detention, whose interrogators were American,
who endured treatment fairly characterised as horrendous” and that she had been “tortured”.

RE-ARREST IN AFGHANISTAN

On 7 July 2008, a press conference led by British journalist Yvonne Ridley, in Pakistan resulted
in mass international coverage of Aafia’s case as her disappearance was questioned by the
media and political figures in Pakistan. Within weeks, the US administration reported that she
was arrested by Afghani forces along with her 13 year old son, outside the governor of Ghazni’s
compound, allegedly with manuals on explosives and ‘dangerous substances in sealed jars’ on
her person. Her lawyers claim that the evidence was planted on her. Aafia would later testify
during her trial that the bag in which the evidence was found was not her own and was given to
her, being unaware of its contents. She also claimed that the handwritten notes were forcibly
copied from a magazine under threat of torture of her children. She recalledthe presence of a
boy at the Ghazni police station whom she believed could have been her son, but could not
know with certainty since they had been separate for several years.

On 3 August 2008 an agent from the FBI visited the home of her brother in Houston, Texas and
confirmed that she was being detained in Afghanistan. On Monday 4 August 2008, federal
prosecutors in the US confirmed that Aafia Siddiqui had been extradited to the US from
Afghanistan where they alleged she had been detained since mid-July 2008. They further allege
that whilst in custody she fired at US officers (none being injured) and was herself shot twice in
the process. Aafia confirmed during her trial that she was hiding behind a curtain in the prison,
as the US claim, with the intent of escaping as she feared being returned to a secret prison, but

categorically denied picking up the gun or attempting to shoot anyone. Aafia was charged in the
US with assaulting and attempted murder of US personnel in Afghanistan.

RELEASE OF AHMED SIDDIQUI

In late August 2008, Michael G Garcia, the US attorney general of the southern region
confirmed in a letter to Dr Fowzia Siddiqui that Aafia’s son, Ahmed had been in the custody of
the FBI since 2003 and was he was currently in the custody of the Karzai government. Earlier
the US ambassador to Pakistan, Anne W Patterson had earlier claimed that Washington has no
information regarding the children.

According to an Afghan Interior Ministry official quoted in the Washington Post, Ahmed Siddiqui
was briefly held by the Interior Ministry after his arrest in July 2008 and was thereafter
transferred to an Afghan intelligence agency, the National Directorate of Security (NDS),
notorious for its brutal treatment of detainees, despite the fact he was too young to be treated
as a criminal suspect under both Afghan and international law.  Under Afghanistan’s Juvenile
Code, the minimum age of criminal responsibility is 13 and according to the UN Committee on
the Rights of the Child a minimum age of criminal responsibility below the age of 12 is “not
internationally acceptable.”

Ahmed was finally released to the custody of Aafia’s family in Pakistan in September 2009.

He later gave a statement to police in Lahore, Pakistan, that he had been held in a juvenile
prison in Afghanistan for years. On being reunited with his father for the first time, he ran away
screaming in horror, claiming that his father was amongst those who used to beat him in
Afghanistan.

THE TRIAL

The trial of Aafia Siddiqui began Tuesday 19 January 2010, in a Manhattan federal courtroom.
Prior to the jury entering the courtroom, Aafia turned to onlookers saying; “This isn’t a fair court,
(…) Why do I have to be here? (…) There are many different versions of how this happened,”
referring to the alleged shooting.

Three government witnesses testified on the opening day of the trial; Army Capt. Robert
Snyder, John Threadcraft, a former army officer and John Jefferson, an FBI agent. Both were
stationed in Afghanistan at the time of the alleged assault and murder attempt.

During the trial, while Snyder testified that Aafia had been arrested with a handwritten note
outlining plans to attack the Empire State Building, the Brooklyn Bridge and Wall Street, Aafia

About Aafia

Written by Administrator
Thursday, 11 March 2010 10:13

disrupted the proceedings with a loud outburst aimed at Snyder, after, which she proclaimed her
innocence stating; “Since I’ll never get a chance to speak, if you were in a secret prison.. where
children were tortured… This is no list of targets against New York. I was never planning to
bomb it. You’re lying.”

In the morning before the closing remarks, the last government witness, FBI Special Agent,
Angela Sercer testified. Sercer monitored Aafia for 12 hours a day over a two week period while
she was at a hospital in Bagram. She tried to rebut Aafia Siddiqui’s testimony, by saying that
Aafia told her she was in “hiding” for the last five years and further that she “married” someone
to change her name.

However under cross examination, Sercer admitted that while at the hospital Aafia expressed
fear of “being tortured”. Sercer also admitted that Aafia expressed concern about the “welfare of
the boy” and asked about him “every day”. Moreover, that Aafia only agreed to talk to her upon
promises that the boy would be safe. According to the testimony Aafia said that the Afghans
had “beaten her”; that her “husband had beaten her and her children”; and that she was “afraid
of coming into physical harm”.

When Sercer was further questioned about what Aafia said about her children during that two
week period, she admitted that Aafia expressed concern about the “safety and welfare of her
children”, but felt that the “kids had been killed or tortured in a secret prison”. “She said that they
were dead, didn’t she” asked Defence attorney, Elaine Sharpe; reluctantly Sercer answered,
“Yes.”

The trial took an unusual turn with an FBI official asserting that the finger prints taken from the
rifle, which was purportedly used by Aafia to shoot at the U.S. interrogators, did not match hers.
Another event complicated the case further, when the testimony of witness Masood Haider Gul
appeared different from the one given by U.S. Captain Schnieder earlier. The defence denied all
charges, stating that “the soldiers had given different versions of where she was when the M-4
was allegedly fired and how many shots were fired.”

The trial lasted for 2 weeks and the jury deliberated for 2 days before reaching a verdict. On
February 3, 2010, she was convicted and found guilty on all counts. , despite the following
discrepancies:

· The court proceedings were flawed, and limited to the incident in Ghazni, which itself lacked
concrete evidence.

· It is still unexplained how a frail, 110 pound woman, confronted with three US army officers,
two interpreters and two FBI agents managed to assault three of them, snatch a rifle from one
of them, open fire at close range, hit no one, but she herself was wounded.

· There were no fingerprints on the gun.

· There was no gunshot residue from the gun.

· There were no bullet holes in the walls from that particular gun.

· There were no bullets cases or shells in the area from the specified gun.

· The testimony of the government’s six eyewitnesses contradicted each other.

· The statements Aafia made to FBI agent Angela Sercer were made whilst she was under 24
hour surveillance by FBI agents in the hospital at Bagram, with her arms and legs tied to a bed
for weeks, several types of meidcation, sleep-deprived and at the mercy of the agent for food,
water and in order to relieve herself. Sercer did not identify herself to Aafia as a FBI agent. The
use of these statements in court were objected to by the defence on the basis of ‘Miranda laws’
which mandate that a detainee must be informed of their rights, have access to an attorney, or
in the case of international law, consular staff and law enforcement officials must identify
themselves. Despite this the judge denied the motion and allowed this to form part of the
questioning.

· Aafia’s disappearance, torture and missing children were not at all addressed during the court
case.

POST CONVICTION

Following her conviction, Aafia remained at the Metropolitan Detention Centre in New York
where she has spent the best part of her detention in the US. Throughout that time, she has
been subject to humilitating and degrading strip and cavity searches, prompting her to refuse
legal visits on many occasions. Since the beginning of March Aafia has been refused all contact
with her family and has not been permitted any letters, phonecalls, visits or reading material
under the pretext of “the security of the nation.”

In April 2010, a 12 year old girl was left outside the resident of Fowzia Siddiqui in Karachi by
unidentified men claiming she was the missing daughter of Aafia Siddiqui. Although initially it
was thought that she was not Aafia’s daughter, following DNA tests conducted by the Pakistani
government, the Interior Minister Rehman Malik confirmed that the tests proved that the child
was indeed Aafia’s daughter, Maryam, and that her DNA matched that of Ahmed Siddiqui
(Aafia’s eldest son) and their father, Amjad Khan. Dr Fowzia intended to carry out their own
independent investigation to confirm the girl’s identity. In a press conference Senate Committee
for Interior Chairman, Senator Talha Mehmood reported that Maryam Siddiqui was recovered
from Bagram airbase in the custody of an American – in the Urdu-language press, an American
soldier – called “John”. He also said that she had been kept for seven years in a ‘cold, dark
room’ in Bagram airbase.

After several postponements, Aafia was finally sentenced to 86 years in prison, on 5 counts, on
September 23rd 2010, making her eligible for release in 2094. She would be 122 years old at
the time of her release, if she remains alive at that time.

The whereabouts and welfare of Aafia’s youngest son, Suleman remains a mystery.

Check Also

Prophet Muhammad’s (pbuh)ﷺ love of the poor

 Posted By MV Media By: Anonymous Source: MuslimVillage.com (via “www.muhammad.net”) The Prophet (ﷺ) enjoined upon Muslims to …

Save the Low Pan! – Eastern Toilet

http://www.uswatulmuslimah.co.za For centuries and centuries, since the beginning of time, the natural position that people …